Step Title
Step Description
Scientific papers might be daunting at first glance. They can be long, dense, and full of jargon, all of which make them seem hard to decipher. But scientific papers typically have a standard structure, which you can use to quickly understand the study and develop a list of questions to ask researchers when you interview them.
Anytime that you’re reporting on a study—whether for its own sake or to bring its findings into a broader story—you will likely be looking for four key pieces of information. And that information can be found in predictable places within any scientific paper, as shown below:
Section of scientific paper:
Section of scientific paper:
Section of scientific paper:
Section of scientific paper:
Once you get a handle on the typical sections of a scientific paper, reading papers will feel more approachable. Click on the interactive elements in selected pages of the sample paper below to learn more about the information you can find in each section.
Original open-access paper: Mueller, R., et al. “Quantifying Disparities in Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Levels in Drinking Water from Overburdened Communities in New Jersey, 2019–2021.” Environmental Health Perspectives 132, no. 4 (2024): e047011.
Description
Step Title
Step Description
Not all scientific studies are the same. Here are some of the most common types and what they can tell us. Remember: No single study can deliver definitive “proof” of anything. Science is an iterative process in which studies build upon—and sometimes correct—past research.
Hover over the cards below to view their descriptions.







Single-study stories are the bread and butter of science journalism. And they can be a helpful entry point for covering science because they’re straightforward and often formulaic, similar to the classic news structure. Single-study stories can be very short briefs (approximately 350 words) or slightly longer reports (approximately 1000 words). Though these aren’t narrative features, there are still ways you can craft them to be compelling.
Science is an iterative process, so a single study is just a small slice of a field. Journalists covering a study have to be careful not to present the results as conclusive or authoritative on a subject.